Where to put it ???

The UN has its own priorities




 

I am not a professor in international law
nor I am a cartographers.

But if and when Mahmoud Abbas , by miracle,
shall get a Palestinian State ,
where shall he put it ?? ( or where to squeeze it /)
The only place available would be:
only between two Israeli-illegal-settlements.

Is it not correct that any description of any state,on this planet,
would start by defining its   borders ??
and secondly defining its political shape , or form.


Where shall we place The State of Palestine ,
when all places are occupied,or shrinking  or simply stolen ??

I would suggest to place it ,somewhere,
inside the building of the United Nations,
between the personnel-entrance and the parking garage.
(that is,  if it would not disturb much the Israelis)


Never mind what I write ,
after all the State of Israel, in 1948,
has started only with 11% of what it is today.

Sherlock Hommos

The real "Reality-show"

Arabs ,
watching Palestine...

Can you name the only country practising ethnic-cleansing
live- on Televisions news , and on daily basis  ?? .
(Like any reality-show on the TV )
And which is very often verbally-blamed......... but never punished !!
nor ever boycotted nor ever sanctioned  !!!

That same country is the recipient of
the biggest USA help and subsidies,
more than the whole of the rest of the (poor) world......alltogether


Besides all that,  this country claims to be
the only democratic-country in its neighbourhood
and to be,  the light-tower of freedoms.



Raja Chemayel

The relevance of any irrelevance

 

Whether the Holocaust took place,or not,
it has no relevance to the illegitimacy
of the State of Israel.

Whether the Palestinian-fighters
could be branded as "terrorists" ,or not,
it has no relevance to the legitimacy of
the  Palestinian just cause.



Raja Chemayel

Palestine´s railways

It is all about Jesus and not Palestine !!

Palestine was the place , only.

History and the Bible are close enough
although not without huge contradictions
and many inaccuracies too .

Yet ,  we almost all agreed to call Palestine
(The Land of Canaan)
as being " the Promised-Land " .

In my humble opinion it is a wrong translation of that expression,
as it must be:"The Land of the Promises" 
instead of the Promised-Land.
 
I shall explain myself :

If we put blind-faith and theology on the side
and we use logic and science and linguistics.
Then we ask ourselves this question :
Why would God , Almighty, offer to the People of Abraham
a piece of land (Palestine). .........
what could be achieved if and when all grand-children of Abraham
would reside in Palestine , and not in Tunis , Tanzania or Timbuktu ??
Why should a Jew reside in Jerusalem
and not in Beirut, Baghdad or Bogota ??

I have no answer !!   do you ???

My sincere belief is that the promise was
the coming of Jesus of Nazareth , the Messiah .
And nothing else.

The confusion was that the meeting-place were Palestine,
and nowhere else........
but Palestine was not the promise, by  itself.


Historians and Theologians mixed this above nuance
because they saw no harm in doing so,
until the day Zionism showed up
and profited from this confusion
for to serve its own ideology and its criminal-plans.

God promised us :
a Messenger , a Savior a Prophet  a Messiah
and not a piece of land.....
what could that country do, without a Messenger , a Savior a Messiah  ??

While,the Messiah could have come anywhere on this planet
and would have delivered the same Message.


With all respect to any and all the theologians , I say :
That, God´s Promise was Jesus
 ...... and not Palestine !!


I add to say :
If Jesus came in Mexico instead of Palestine
I would still be a Christian

and
if Mohamad would have come to Berlin
instead of Mecca I would still accept and respect Islam.

and if Marx would have lived in Brazil,
and if Plato were a Canadian citizen,
and if Beethoven would have lived and composed 
in China , he would remain a genius.

It is Jesus....... ...and not Palestine !!!
so leave Palestine in Peace
and go look for Jesus !!

Raja Chemayel

Fanaticism....

http://www.acapela. tv/good-old- times-bd724b5885 9d0.html



Religious-fanaticism
has created the State of Israel
so why should we then blame
any other religious-fanaticism
for trying to liberate his own Palestine ?


All those Fanatic-liberators
have always had
full-national- rights
while all the Fanatic-invaders
never did !


Fanaticism or not ,
there is
a foreign-invader
and an
invaded-indigenous.

Raja
Fourth of May 2009