Friday, February 12, 2010

James Bond did not change.
Two actors playing  pre-scripted- roles

Do you remember all those James Bond Films ??
Do you also recall that the role of James Bond
was played by more than 5 or 6 different actors ??

Do you agree that all the actors represented an identical hero
who was , charming, sharp , valiant , intelligent
and audacious ???? who always won from the evil guys
and he ran away with a pretty girl, at the end of the film.  ?? !!

One thing did not change .
James Bond actors were always , the same,
handsome- middle-aged- white-men.

Now imagine that the next film
shall have Will Smith acting  as the "James Bond"

And then Will Smith must be :
"charming,sharp, valiant,intelligent and audacious"
(but black !!)

Now ,
do you remember the last  5 or 6  US Presidents ??
who were all middle-aged- white-men (and not especially "handsome").

And now,today,  we have a black-middle-aged US President
and probably a bit " handsome" too
but the role shall not change .........for Barack Obama, the actor ,
simply because he must play the identical-standard- role of
a President of the United States......
just like Will Smith ,
they both shall play a pre-set-role......
whether Black or White .....and according to a script-book.

James Bond did not change !! 

nor would Mr. President do !!
" with  a license to kill"
just like all the  US Presidents
(coming soon in the theater of  your country)

Sherlock Hommos
a realist films goer

Thursday, February 11, 2010

The effect of the contrary to a castration,%2B30%2B2009.jpg
the sincere majority has no GUCCI
 The GUCCI revolution
of the  minority.
"Blood" but  without a wound !!
(or the actress without a GUCCI)

Today the 11Th. of February
we commemorate two historical events

It is twenty years since Nelson Mandela was released
its is thirty years since that the people of Iran were released

The difference lies basically in the fact that
Nelson was " castrated " before his release
while the people of Iran experienced
the effect of the contrary to a castration

Another difference between
those two welcomed events
is that after the success in South Africa
the new government took a moderate-course
while in Iran it went "Revolutionary"

I watched today on my TV
the celebrations in South Africa
where black people were happy with their black power
while in Tehran ,
only  a minority was not celebrating
and all were wearing black-glasses
either not to be recognised
or simply to show us that they are dressed
or by Calvin Klein or  Ted Lapidus
or Yves Saint Laurent.

But the common factor remains present
at the Mandela supporters
who are all poorly dressed
exactly as the masses of Tehran
who cannot afford GUCCI.

Of course the Western Media
shall be of another opinion than mine....
never mind !!
they are not paying my salary !!

Sherlock Hommos
trend analyser

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

One Myth less.......and one Fact more .
this is where Arab-christians have hidden
away from Byzantines and from the Romans
before the coming of Islam.

The Myth that the early Christians in the Lebanon
have had " to hide away high up  in the mountains
by fear of the invading-Islam- waves ",
in the seventh century,
is completely incorrect , and much misleading too.

Those early (Maronite) Christians were already hiding
up in those mountains, 150 years, before Islam
ever came to the Lebanon and Syria.

those (Maronite)Christian s were fearing the Byzantines
who have sent (christian)- royal-armies to persecute them and to
burn down their cloisters... ...and their churches.
There were basic theological differences and interpretations,
 among other dogma´s, like the identity of Jesus  or the
leadership of the different Churches.

More over ,
many christian-Arab- local-sects joined with the Islamic armies
to fight back against the Imperial-Byzantines -Tyranny.
As some arab-christians- tribes also fought along side Islam
to invade Persia and beyond .

Four centuries later ,
Arab-Christians of the near East were completely divided,
as to what to do with the invading Crusaders... ....
and they fought on both sides of those wars.

Fourteen centuries after Islam ,
Arab-Christians are still "alive and kicking" ,
which is a compliment to Islam .

if you still see Christians in the mountains of the Lebanon,today,
they are only hiding away from the summer-heat of Beirut....

And if you still see Christians in Iraq ,
they are probably waiting for the return
of the next Saddam Hussein
while the Copts of Egypt are hoping
for another Gamal Abdel-Nasser.

Raja Chemayel

a Christian-Arab from 1.100 meters high in the mountains of the Lebanon
into minus 3 meters below-sea-level. ....... in Amsterdam.

All Christian of the Middle East shared the same fate
and the same fears. But none of them were forced
nor even asked to join Islam.
Romans and Byzantines  have killed more christian-arabs
when the Islam has practically  killed none !!

Monday, February 8, 2010

The Mother of Terrorism

on the occasion of the
20.000th visitor
to my  (English & Arabic) Blog ,
today  the 8th.of Feb.2010
add to that :
French-Blog 16.340
Portuguese-Blog 10.100
Spanish-Blog 9.790
German-Blog 5.377
my thanks and my gratitude
Adib, Alexandre, Annie, Cristina, Ellen, Fausto  et Yaotl.
and all the readers , of course !!!

leads to
which is the
Mother of Terrorism

Raja Chemayel

Sunday, February 7, 2010

How the West (Bank) was won ??
 Big-Chief-Abbas (left) talking to Lee-Roy Nathanyahu

Do you remember that classical western-films
do you not see similarities with today´s film in the West-Bank.

Of course the o
fficial governments do nothing....
they just send their Settlers to do the robbing  and the conquests :
those profitable expantions .

It happened
once upon a time in the West

and it happens now in the WEST-BANK.

Both Governments stand aside , 

blameless and as spectators
while they support and finance their Settlers.

John Wayne said : "the only good-indian is a dead-indian"
and Ariel Sharon has said even worse things about Palestinians.

The West Bank is being robbed , piece by piece ,
because the  Abbas-nostra  and the Oslo-clan
are fishing for Peace "in that sea of aggressions"

The Americans who have stolen the West from the Indians
 were called : The Settlers.

The Israelis who are stealing the West-Bank from the Palestinians
are called: The Settlers .

Coincidence ?? no Sir  !! they are twins.

 Because if you have stolen Tel-Aviv and the Palestinian coast ,
you are called "Israeli" but when you continue stealing the West-Bank
you are then called "Settler".

The same in the USA , if you have stolen New-York
and Boston and the East-Coast ,you are called "American"
but when you continued stealing the Far-West ,
you were then called " Settler "

But both have sent their " Settlers" to do their dirty jobs,
and both ,at the end, annexed what their settlers have robbed for them.

It is not a Far-West-film-fantasy
and it never was, not even in America  !.

Raja Chemayel